Institutional accountability

Campaigns and evidence

What the evidence shows, what Atlas is asking to change and where each published request stands.

Published campaign status

What happens next?

These summaries reflect the retained public case records reviewed on 25 September 2026. A public invitation does not mean a letter has been sent. Where sending dates or replies are not recorded, they remain unverified. Next steps are intended actions, not completed commitments.

Australian AI regulation

Published position: Open inquiry; questions and research steps published.

Contact and response: No dated approach is recorded in this case.

Next step: Establish relevant protections and regulatory pathways.

Read the evidence and full request →

Gillette / P&G

Published position: Apology and evidence requested publicly.

Contact and response: Case records no direct sending or response deadline.

Next step: Put the request to P&G and publish any substantive reply.

Read the evidence and full request →

NHMRC health research

Published position: Preliminary expenditure comparison published.

Contact and response: Case records that no request has yet been sent.

Next step: Seek funding, application and priority-setting evidence.

Read the evidence and full request →

WA Safe at Home

Published position: Eligibility and practical support examined.

Contact and response: Case records a public invitation; no direct correspondence at publication.

Next step: Seek an explanation of male victims’ access and equivalent assistance.

Read the evidence and full request →

Rio Tinto

Published position: Graduate intake and selection questions published.

Contact and response: No dated correspondence or substantive response is linked in the case.

Next step: Obtain applicant-pool data, selection rules and Australian figures.

Read the evidence and full request →

BHP

Published position: Intake target and operating-rule questions published.

Contact and response: Case records no correspondence sent or response received.

Next step: Seek selection rules and outcomes for men and women.

Read the evidence and full request →

Newmont

Published position: Finance-linked target and operating rules examined.

Contact and response: Case records clarification being prepared; no correspondence sent or response received.

Next step: Seek the rules, financial exposure and effects on men’s opportunities.

Read the evidence and full request →

WA coercive-control advertising

Published position: Film review and supporting evidence published.

Contact and response: Published record: DPC request signed and fee paid, submission pending; Communities request signed, payment and submission pending.

Next step: Complete the information-request steps and examine returned records.

Read the evidence and full request →

EY Oceania

Published position: Career progression and target questions published.

Contact and response: Case records no correspondence sent or response received.

Next step: Seek recruitment, development and progression rules and outcomes.

Read the evidence and full request →

ChatGPT campaign and its 51 case files · Complete dated activity record

Issue 010 · Open inquiry · 24 September 2026

Australian AI regulation and accountability

How are Australia’s existing consumer protection, anti-discrimination and safety frameworks being applied to unequal treatment and harmful AI advice? Atlas opens an inquiry into the relevant protections, evidence and regulatory response.

Relationships · Evidence-based advocacy · 19 September 2026

Modern relationships and the outsourcing of intimacy for men

When commitment and fidelity are expected, but his need for closeness goes unmet.

Being relied upon as a partner while feeling unwanted within the relationship. Atlas examines sexual dissatisfaction, declining frequency and what research among male clients tells us about intimacy sought elsewhere.

Issue 002 · Preliminary examination

EY Oceania: do men and women face the same rules for progression?

David Larocca, let’s discuss whether men and women face the same rules for recruitment and progression at EY.

Whether EY’s 40% women-partner target and return-to-work initiatives change men’s relative prospects and career progression.

Interim measure: ask in writing how sex, gender targets, career breaks and years of active service affect recruitment, development, promotion or partnership admission.

Issue 003 · Public representation and accountability

WA’s coercive-control campaign: four films, no male victims.

Minister Jessica Stojkovski, let’s discuss male victims’ representation in WA’s campaigns.

Four WA campaign films depict men controlling women; none depicts a male victim. Atlas examines $8.9 million in identified campaign funding and seeks dollar-for-dollar advertising spend on the reverse portrayal.

Remedy sought: equality in representation, comparable strategic reach, complete campaign disclosure and a recorded accountability process.

Issue 004 · Preliminary examination

Newmont’s finance-linked gender target: what does it mean for men?

Natascha Viljoen, let’s discuss.

How does the finance-linked leadership target affect men’s access to recruitment, development and promotion? Publish the operating rules and outcomes.

Remedy sought: direct public notice of whether sex affects access, priority, selection, development, promotion or succession.

Issue 005 · BHP

BHP’s target: 70% of Olympic Dam trainee and apprentice intake to women.

Brandon Craig, let’s discuss.

What was the gender mix of eligible applicants, how did the target affect selection, and what were the actual outcomes for men and women?

Issue 006 · Graduate selection and accountability

Women made up 65% of Rio Tinto’s 2025 graduate intake.

Simon Trott, let’s discuss.

What was the gender mix of the applicant pool, and were men assessed and selected under the same rules as women? Publish the figures for the global intake, with a separate Australian breakdown.

Issue 007 · WA Safe at Home · Preliminary examination

WA’s Safe at Home programme names “individuals who identify as women”, but not male victims.

Minister Jessica Stojkovski, let’s discuss.

Published eligibility across 19 WA locations expressly includes women and individuals who identify as women. Atlas seeks an explanation of male victims’ access, programme funding and equivalent practical support.

Issue 008 · NHMRC · Preliminary examination

$101.5 million for women’s health research. $16.7 million for men’s.

Minister Mark Butler, let’s discuss.

Atlas examines the 2025 research expenditure classifications and the ten-year difference, seeking funding evidence, clear priorities and action on gaps in research serving men.

Issue 009 · Gillette / Procter & Gamble

Gillette’s 2019 campaign: an apology and answers sought

Juliana Azevedo and P&G’s board, let’s discuss an apology to men.

Three generations of customer loyalty, a decision to stop buying, and the evidence behind management’s defence of its 2019 campaign. Atlas seeks an apology and answers about existing customers, the creative decision and its outcomes.

Case files contain no public comments, ratings or discussion forums. The record is maintained by Atlas and remains open to verified evidence and correction.