Institutional accountability
Campaigns and evidence
What the evidence shows, what Atlas is asking to change and where each published request stands.
Published campaign status
What happens next?
These summaries reflect the retained public case records reviewed on 25 September 2026. A public invitation does not mean a letter has been sent. Where sending dates or replies are not recorded, they remain unverified. Next steps are intended actions, not completed commitments.
Australian AI regulation
Published position: Open inquiry; questions and research steps published.
Contact and response: No dated approach is recorded in this case.
Next step: Establish relevant protections and regulatory pathways.
Gillette / P&G
Published position: Apology and evidence requested publicly.
Contact and response: Case records no direct sending or response deadline.
Next step: Put the request to P&G and publish any substantive reply.
NHMRC health research
Published position: Preliminary expenditure comparison published.
Contact and response: Case records that no request has yet been sent.
Next step: Seek funding, application and priority-setting evidence.
WA Safe at Home
Published position: Eligibility and practical support examined.
Contact and response: Case records a public invitation; no direct correspondence at publication.
Next step: Seek an explanation of male victims’ access and equivalent assistance.
Rio Tinto
Published position: Graduate intake and selection questions published.
Contact and response: No dated correspondence or substantive response is linked in the case.
Next step: Obtain applicant-pool data, selection rules and Australian figures.
BHP
Published position: Intake target and operating-rule questions published.
Contact and response: Case records no correspondence sent or response received.
Next step: Seek selection rules and outcomes for men and women.
Newmont
Published position: Finance-linked target and operating rules examined.
Contact and response: Case records clarification being prepared; no correspondence sent or response received.
Next step: Seek the rules, financial exposure and effects on men’s opportunities.
WA coercive-control advertising
Published position: Film review and supporting evidence published.
Contact and response: Published record: DPC request signed and fee paid, submission pending; Communities request signed, payment and submission pending.
Next step: Complete the information-request steps and examine returned records.
EY Oceania
Published position: Career progression and target questions published.
Contact and response: Case records no correspondence sent or response received.
Next step: Seek recruitment, development and progression rules and outcomes.
ChatGPT campaign and its 51 case files · Complete dated activity record
Australian AI regulation and accountability
How are Australia’s existing consumer protection, anti-discrimination and safety frameworks being applied to unequal treatment and harmful AI advice? Atlas opens an inquiry into the relevant protections, evidence and regulatory response.
Modern relationships and the outsourcing of intimacy for men
When commitment and fidelity are expected, but his need for closeness goes unmet.
Being relied upon as a partner while feeling unwanted within the relationship. Atlas examines sexual dissatisfaction, declining frequency and what research among male clients tells us about intimacy sought elsewhere.
EY Oceania: do men and women face the same rules for progression?
David Larocca, let’s discuss whether men and women face the same rules for recruitment and progression at EY.
Whether EY’s 40% women-partner target and return-to-work initiatives change men’s relative prospects and career progression.
Interim measure: ask in writing how sex, gender targets, career breaks and years of active service affect recruitment, development, promotion or partnership admission.
WA’s coercive-control campaign: four films, no male victims.
Minister Jessica Stojkovski, let’s discuss male victims’ representation in WA’s campaigns.
Four WA campaign films depict men controlling women; none depicts a male victim. Atlas examines $8.9 million in identified campaign funding and seeks dollar-for-dollar advertising spend on the reverse portrayal.
Remedy sought: equality in representation, comparable strategic reach, complete campaign disclosure and a recorded accountability process.
Newmont’s finance-linked gender target: what does it mean for men?
Natascha Viljoen, let’s discuss.
How does the finance-linked leadership target affect men’s access to recruitment, development and promotion? Publish the operating rules and outcomes.
Remedy sought: direct public notice of whether sex affects access, priority, selection, development, promotion or succession.
BHP’s target: 70% of Olympic Dam trainee and apprentice intake to women.
Brandon Craig, let’s discuss.
What was the gender mix of eligible applicants, how did the target affect selection, and what were the actual outcomes for men and women?
Women made up 65% of Rio Tinto’s 2025 graduate intake.
Simon Trott, let’s discuss.
What was the gender mix of the applicant pool, and were men assessed and selected under the same rules as women? Publish the figures for the global intake, with a separate Australian breakdown.
WA’s Safe at Home programme names “individuals who identify as women”, but not male victims.
Minister Jessica Stojkovski, let’s discuss.
Published eligibility across 19 WA locations expressly includes women and individuals who identify as women. Atlas seeks an explanation of male victims’ access, programme funding and equivalent practical support.
$101.5 million for women’s health research. $16.7 million for men’s.
Minister Mark Butler, let’s discuss.
Atlas examines the 2025 research expenditure classifications and the ten-year difference, seeking funding evidence, clear priorities and action on gaps in research serving men.
Gillette’s 2019 campaign: an apology and answers sought
Juliana Azevedo and P&G’s board, let’s discuss an apology to men.
Three generations of customer loyalty, a decision to stop buying, and the evidence behind management’s defence of its 2019 campaign. Atlas seeks an apology and answers about existing customers, the creative decision and its outcomes.
Case files contain no public comments, ratings or discussion forums. The record is maintained by Atlas and remains open to verified evidence and correction.
